The complainant felt that the audio recording of their testimony seemed to be severed in parts and that a judge lied about the complainant’s comments.

webid-20150000

The complainant felt that the audio recording of their testimony seemed to be severed in parts and that a judge lied about the complainant’s comments.

The audio recording was carefully reviewed alongside the transcript, and it was determined to be a true representation of the recorded testimony. While there was some background noise, it was clear that the transcript and the audio recording were parallel in information. The matter was closed.

Back