The complainant wrote to the Council to claim that the judges in her case participated in the use of false affidavits and unjustified access to personal information from 2002 to 2011, including access to personal health records, which adversely affected her estates matter.

webid-20150000

The complainant wrote to the Council to claim that the judges in her case participated in the use of false affidavits and unjustified access to personal information from 2002 to 2011, including access to personal health records, which adversely affected her estates matter. She expressed that those activities were against the public’s best interest and resulted in a conflict of interest.

The Council clarified in its response to the complainant that when someone makes a complaint about the conduct of any federally-appointed judge, it is important to be as specific as possible in describing the objectionable conduct while including any particulars or other evidence they may have. As there was insufficient evidence of misconduct, the matter was closed.

Back