MAKING A COMPLAINT
We expect judges to maintain a high standard of conduct, both inside
and outside the courtroom. When someone believes that a judge’s
behaviour (not their decision) is of concern, or that a judge is not fit
to sit on the Bench, a complaint can be made to the Canadian Judicial
Council. In very serious cases, Parliament can remove a judge from office.
What is judicial conduct?
Judicial conduct (a judge’s conduct/behaviour) refers to the high
standard of personal conduct that is expected of judges, both in court
and in public. If a judge is not suitable to be a member of the judiciary,
the justice system provides for a way to investigate the judge’s
inappropriate behaviour and remove them from office.
There is an important distinction between a judge’s personal conduct
in or outside of a courtroom and a decision that a judge makes in a particular
court case. If a federally appointed judge’s behaviour is not appropriate,
you can make a complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council. If you believe
that the judge reached the wrong decision in your court case, you can
appeal to a higher court to review that decision.
What is the Canadian Judicial Council’s
role?
If a federally appointed judge has breached the standard of good behaviour
and is not suitable to be a member of the judiciary, only Parliament can
remove the judge from office. And, under the Judges
Act, Parliament has assigned the process to review alleged breaches
of conduct to the Canadian Judicial Council.
By directing complaints to the Canadian Judicial Council, Parliament
acknowledges that the public must have a way to voice its concerns about
judges. At the same time, the system must allow judges to respond to allegations
of misconduct in a fair manner. The process must be efficient, fair, and
objective.
The complaint process is described fully in this section of the website.
In general, when the Council receives a complaint about a judge, a member
of the Council’s Judicial Conduct Committee reviews the complaint
and decides how the matter should be handled. Handling the complaint may range from asking the judge in question to provide comments about the complaint, to holding a full inquiry into the matter.
Who can you make a complaint against?
The Canadian Judicial Council has the authority to investigate complaints
only about federally appointed judges in Canada. These are judges from
federal courts and higher
levels of courts in each province.
The Council cannot investigate general complaints about the justice system,
the courts, or the judiciary as a whole. It cannot change judicial decisions
in court cases, compensate individuals, grant appeals, or address demands
for a new trial.
The Canadian Judicial Council does not have jurisdiction over the lower
levels of provincial courts, such
as those that hear small claims disputes, and some family and criminal
matters. If you want to make a complaint about a judge in one of those
courts, you must direct your complaint to the judicial
council in your province or territory.
The Canadian Judicial Council does not have the authority to investigate
complaints against court staff or lawyers. Complaints about court staff
should be made to the court administration office of the courthouse in question.
Complaints about lawyers should be made to the Law
Society in your province or territory.
What kind of complaint can
you make?
In brief, the Canadian Judicial Council investigates complaints about
an individual judge’s inappropriate conduct, not a judge’s
decision in a court case.
Every year, judges in Canadian courts make hundreds of thousands of decisions
on matters ranging from procedural issues to determining important points
of law. When one party in a legal dispute thinks the judge made the wrong
decision, the justice system allows that person to appeal to a higher
court. For example, if you think that a judge of the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice reached the wrong decision in your case, you can appeal
the decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal.
Judges can make mistakes. An appeal court can reverse or vary the decision
made by the judge who heard the case. The fact that an appeal court overturns
a judge’s decision does not mean that the judge’s conduct
was improper or that the judge should be removed from office. It simply
means that the appeal court believed the judge made a mistake about the
law or the facts of the case.
All judges are expected to uphold a high standard of personal conduct,
both inside and outside the courtroom. So, aside from the decision the
judge reaches in your case, the judge must be impartial when hearing your
case, be respectful and courteous throughout the proceedings, and maintain
a high standard of integrity. For example, it is appropriate for members
of the public to ask the Council to investigate complaints about judges
who are thought to have shown biases based on race, gender, or religion.
Complaints can arise from judges’ comments in the courtroom, from
speeches or interviews given outside the courtroom.
If you are concerned about the conduct of a federally appointed
judge, think carefully about the kind of action you may take:
- If you believe the judge made the wrong decision in your case,
consider appealing your case to a higher court.
- If you believe a judge’s conduct was improper, either
during your case or in public, consider making a complaint to
the Canadian Judicial Council.
|
Who can make a complaint?
Although the Minister of Justice or a provincial Attorney General can
initiate a formal inquiry about a federally appointed judge, most complaints
come from the general public.
If a provincial Attorney General or the Minister of Justice of Canada
submits a complaint, the Council must appoint an Inquiry Committee to
consider whether a recommendation should be made to the Minister of Justice
to remove the judge from office. The Inquiry Committee must hold a hearing,
normally in public. The Council then considers the report of the Inquiry
Committee and makes a recommendation to the Minister of Justice.
In accordance with the complaints process, the Canadian Judicial Council
can also initiate an inquiry into a judge’s conduct.
Any member of the public can make a complaint to the Council. Provided
the complaint is about judicial conduct, is made in writing, and is about
a specific federally appointed judge, the Council will review the matter.
How do you make a complaint?
The Canadian Judicial Council seeks to ensure a fair process when a complaint
is made against a judge. Every complaint is considered seriously and conscientiously.
You do not have to be represented by a lawyer if you want to make a complaint
about a judge. You do not need to use a special form to make a complaint
to the Council. There is no fee charged and no deadline for making a complaint.
The Council requires only that a complaint be:
- in writing;
- about a named, federally appointed judge; and
- about the conduct of a judge and not their decision.
You can write a letter to the Canadian Judicial Council, and send it
by regular mail (Canadian Judicial Council, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0W8)
or by email. Your letter should
include:
- your name and address;
- the name of the judge you are making a complaint against; and
- a description of the judge’s conduct that you believe was inappropriate.
What happens after you make a complaint?
The Council is committed to reviewing complaints about the conduct of
judges in a way that is sensitive to the person making the complaint,
fair to the judge who the complaint was about, and credible to the judiciary
and the public. While the public must have a way to voice its concerns
about members of the judiciary, the judges must be given an opportunity
to respond to the allegation of misconduct. The complaint procedure is
set out fully in the Canadian Judicial Council’s Complaint Procedures.
The Council takes complaints very seriously and deals with them as quickly
as possible. Out of the 200 or so complaints received every year, the
Council concludes the majority of them within three months.
Step 1: review of complaint
A member of the Council’s Judicial Conduct Committee first reviews
the complaint. Many complaints are dismissed because they do not meet
the criteria for review. For example, some complaints are about a judge’s
decision in a case, not his or her conduct; others may be about a provincially
appointed judge, rather than a federally appointed judge.
Step 2: investigation of the complaint
When the Council further investigates, a copy of the complaint is sent to the judge in question and the chief justice of that judge’s province, with a request for comments. The Complainant may also be asked to provide additional comments.
Some complaints contain serious allegations of inappropriate conduct
against a judge and must be further investigated by the Council. Such
cases may be investigated with the assistance of a lawyer from outside
the Council. This person is chosen for their expertise and reputation
in the legal community. The lawyer may interview the judge, the complainant,
and others who are connected with the situation, and prepare a report.
Step 3: review by a Panel
If the complaint is not immediately resolved, the matter may be handed
over to a panel for further review. The panel is composed of up to five
Council members and senior judges. If the panel concludes that the complaint
has merit, but is not serious enough to move to the next stage (formal
hearing by the Inquiry Committee), the panel may close the file with an
expression of concern, or may recommend counselling for the judge, or
other similar remedial actions.
Step 4: Inquiry Committee
If the complaint is serious enough to warrant the judge’s removal
from office, or the complaint comes from a provincial Attorney General
or the Minster of Justice of Canada, the panel can recommend that the
Council establish an Inquiry Committee, composed of Council members and
senior lawyers.
The Inquiry Committee can conduct its own investigation into the complaint,
and interview the judge, the person who made the complaint, and others.
The Inquiry Committee normally holds a public hearing, where the judge
and the person who complained can attend and give evidence about the matter
that led to the complaint. The Inquiry Committee prepares a report, which
goes to the full Canadian Judicial Council for discussion.
Step 5: recommendations
After considering the Inquiry Committee’s report, the Council must
decide whether the judge’s conduct has rendered the judge “incapacitated
or disabled from the due execution of the office of judge.”
Council may recommend to Parliament (through the Minister of Justice)
that the judge be removed from office. Parliament has never had to face
such a situation, but sometimes a judge will retire or resign before that
step is taken.
Step 6: notice of the decision
When the complaint has been considered and a decision is reached, the
Council will advise the person who complained of its decision in writing.
Overview of the complaint process
The complaints process is periodically reviewed to ensure that it continues
to serve the public interest. The process is set out in the chart below:
Checklist for making a complaint to the Canadian
Judicial Council
- no deadline
- no fee
- no need for legal representation
- no special form required
- complaint must:
- be about a federally appointed judge
- be about a judge’s conduct (not a decision the judge
made in court)
- be in writing
- be sent by mail or email
- include your name and address
- give the judge’ s name
- provide the date, court, and circumstances of the judge’s
conduct in question
- describe the judge’s conduct in question
|
|