The complainant claimed that the judge’s decision in a very public case involving a city and a private company was a result of bribery.

webid-20150000

The complainant claimed that the judge’s decision in a very public case involving a city and a private company was a result of bribery.

The complainant was advised that the Council has no authority to review a judicial decision for the purpose of determining its correctness, nor can the Council change or rescind a judgment. Where a litigant disagrees with a finding or a decision, the appropriate recourse lies with the appeal level. As the complaint did not involve judicial conduct nor provided evidence to the allegations, the matter was closed.

Back